He who seeks equity must do Equity


The saying implies that to acquire a fair help the offended party must himself be set up to do 'value', that is, an offended party must perceive and submit to one side of his enemy. Sacred texts of Islam likewise educate us to be honest: "Hardship to the individuals who stretch the measure: Who when they take by measure from others, precise the full; However, when they dispense to them or weigh to them, minish… "

 Application and cases 

This adage has application in the accompanying conventions 

I) Illegal advances 

ii) Doctrine of Election 

iii) Consolidation of home loans 

iv) Notice to recover contract 

v) Wife's value to settlement 

vi) Equitable estoppel 

vii) Restitution of advantages on wiping out of exchange 

viii) Set-off 


I) Illegal credits: In Lodge v. National Union Investment Co. Ltd., the certainties were as per the following. One B obtained cash from M by selling certain protections to him. M was an unregistered cash loan specialist. Under the Money-loan specialists' Act, 1900, the agreement was illicit and accordingly void. B sued M for return of the protections. The court wouldn't make a request aside from upon the terms that B ought to reimburse the cash which had been progressed to him. 


ii) Doctrine of race: Where a giver A gives his own property to B and in a similar instrument implies to give B's property to C, B will be put to a decision, either acknowledge the advantage allowed to him by the benefactor and give away his very own property to C or hold his very own property and decline to acknowledge the property of An on condition. In any case, B can not hold his property and in the meantime take the property of A. 


iii) Consolidation of home loans: Where an individual has turned out to be qualified for two home loans from a similar mortgagor, he may merge these home loans and decline to allow the mortgagee to practice his evenhanded appropriate to reclaim one home loan except if the other is recovered. The privilege of solidification presently exists in England yet after the establishment of the Law of Property Act, 1925, it can exist just by express reservation in one of the home loan deeds. 


iv) Notice to reclaim contract: Notice to a mortgagor to recover one's home loan is a fair right of the mortgagor. 


v) Wife's value to a settlement: There was the point at which lady's property was converged with that of her significant other. She had no property of her own. Value court forced on the spouse that he should make a sensible arrangement for his significant other and her youngsters. However, presently, Under the Law Reform (Married Women and Tortfeasors) Act, 1935, wedded ladies has full ideal on her property and it isn't solidified with her significant other's property.


vi) Equitable estoppel: A promissory estoppel emerges where a gathering has explicitly or impliedly, by direct or by carelessness, created an impression of truth, or so acted, that another would sensibly comprehend that he made a guarantee consequently, at that point the gathering who made such guarantee needs to complete his guarantee. 


vii) Restitution of advantages on undoing of exchange: It is legitimate equity to restore the advantages of an agreement which was voidable, and, value implemented this standards in situations where it conceded alleviation of rescission of an agreement. A gathering can not be permitted to exploit his own wrong. 


viii) Set-off: Where there have been shared credits, common obligations or other regular dealings between the indebted person and any lender, the total due from one gathering is to be set-off against any aggregate due from the other party, and just the parity of the record is to be guaranteed or paid on either side individually. 



I) The interest for an impartial alleviation must emerge from a suit that is pending. 

ii) This proverb is pertinent to a gathering who looks for an evenhanded alleviation. 



I) Under sec 19-An of the Contract Act, 1872 if an agreement winds up voidable and the gathering who went into the agreement voids the agreement, he has return the advantage of the agreement. 

ii) sec 35 of the Transfer of Property Act encapsulates the rule of race. 

iii) Sec 51 and 54 of the Transfer of Property Act. 

iv) In Order 8, Rule 6 of the CPC, the teaching of Set-off is perceived.

Leave a Reply